Universal Free Education

Try to imagine a society where every individual, regardless of their background, could attend college without the burdens of overwhelming debt. In several other nations around the world, this is already a reality, yet here in the United States, this idea remains a fantasy for millions. With student debt surpassing $1.5 trillion dollars and the cost of tuition continuing to skyrocket, the time has come to reimagine higher education as a public good and one that is accessible to all and funded by the society it serves. This idea is not only ethically justified, but economically sound. Education should be free to students, and it should be financed through public means. An educated population benefits all aspects of society.

A cornerstone of democracy has always been viewed in public education. Just as society deemed it necessary to promote and provide K-12 education at no immediately visible direct cost to students and taxpayers, the same logic should apply to undergraduate and post-graduate studies. College funded by the public is not a new concept, with countries like Germany, Norway, and Finland implementing such systems with measurable success. These nations have demonstrated that when higher education is regarded as a public service rather than a commodity, workforce readiness improves and innovation blossoms. Unfortunately, the United States views higher education as a personal investment without any regard for the societal benefits, leaving individuals to carry the debt despite the broad advantages.

It is important that society understands education as a public good. Public goods are characterized by their non-excludability and non-rivalrous consumption. This means that one person’s use does not diminish another’s, and no one can be effectively excluded from its benefits. We can find common examples in roads, national defense, or even clean air. Public education also fits this mold. When people are educated, they contribute more effectively to their communities, economies, and democratic institutions. They are statistically less likely to rely on government aid and more likely to participate in civic life. In all, they’re better equipped to tackle complex problems in society. UNESCO highlights this point by linking the increase in education to more stable societies, citing reduced crime rates and lower instances of early pregnancy as key benefits. It would make sense that investing in higher education is not merely an act of generosity, but rather a sensible strategy for long term national wellbeing.

The return on investment in education is well documented. Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows public institutions invest approximately $20,500 annually per tertiary student. At first glance, this seems like a high figure, but the long-term payoff is even greater. College grads earn significantly more over the span of their lives that those with only a high school diploma, translating into increased tax revenues. Educated individuals are less likely to experience unemployment, reducing the strain on government safety nets. These outcomes benefit everyone equally, not just the individuals earning their degrees. In fact, the broader the access to education, the greater the economic benefit. Countries with tuition-free college systems tend to have higher levels of innovation and economic competitiveness, which demonstrates that public investment in higher education yields incredible returns.

Of course, the idea that taxpayers should fund education often meets a brick wall of resistance from those who believe it is unfair to subsidize others’ schooling. This objection overlooks the fundamental principle of collective investment in shared resources. A counter argument to this is often one pointing out that most people do not use every public service they helped to fund. A person may go their entire lives without calling the fire department. More relevant, people without children are still contributing to the public school system in their area. This is where the justification lies. An educated society reduces crime, increases the output of the economy, and it enhances overall quality of life. Publicly funded education is the same. It is an investment in the infrastructure of society and is no less vital than roads or emergency services. Regardless of whether one is directly involved, there is mutual benefit to them for contributing to higher education.

The GI Bill is a historical precedent which supports the value of taxpayer-funded education. The GI Bill was passed to provide free college education to returning World War II veterans. This policy did not solely help the individuals, it catalyzed a period of unprecedented economic growth, which fueled the rise of a thriving middle class. Today we refer to that period as the “baby boomer era”. Similar principles apply to society today. When states and local municipalities invest in education, the local economy benefits through increased earnings, the creation of business, and reduced reliance on public assistance. A case study conducted for the Governor’s office of Illinois revealed that providing tuition-free community college led to economic growth. This is a compelling case for implementation.

Switching lenses, incarceration rates offer a new view into the social impact of education. Numerous studies have shown that education significantly reduces recidivism. Inmates who participate in educational programs while incarcerated are 43% less likely to reoffend after release. Some estimates place the reduction at up to 70 percent. This is a dramatic improvement to public safety and a huge cost savings to the taxpayer. Every dollar invested in prison education returns an estimated $4 to $5 in reduced incarceration costs within the first three years after release (Department of Justice & Education, 2013; RAND Corporation, 2013). Such a statistic illustrates that education is a powerful tool for both individual transformation and systemic reform.

The case is strong, but it is also important to acknowledge potential challenges. Critics point to concerns about cost, quality, and institutional overcrowding. These are valid issues, but they are not impossible to overcome. Progressive funding models can be created, ensuring that wealthy individuals contribute more to the system. Capacities can be scaled responsibly with proper planning and investment. Quality can be maintained through accreditation standards and performance-based funding mechanisms. The goal here is to create a system that is more inclusive, efficient, and beneficial to society without creating barriers that prevent capable students from pursuing higher education.

One of the biggest criticisms to date is that universal free college might lead to something called “over-enrollment” or diminish the perceived value of a degree. Evidence from countries with these tuition-free systems suggest otherwise. Enrollment increases are more than manageable in these cases, and the respect for education has remained intact. When students are not plagued with the debt of education, they are far more likely to obtain careers in public service or research. They’re even more likely to go into fields that offer lower pay but contribute to society on a significant level. This kind of flexibility offers solutions to problems like teacher shortages and other areas like nursing positions or social work.

The mental health implications behind debt are severe. Students have put off buying a house or starting families due to the burden of student loan debt. Students with an entrepreneurial drive will delay starting a business, stagnating economic growth. The list goes on. Free education stands to alleviate the burden of debt and grant a sense of personal freedom that promotes a healthier society. With free education, students will make choices based on their dreams, not their bank account.

Having a higher level of education also means an increased likelihood to vote in elections. Volunteerism and community action are fostered by those with degrees. Both of these activities strengthen democracy and promote a strong sense of community. In this day and age, marked by polarizing politics and a growing distrust in institutions due to misinformation, access to higher education could be a beacon of hope. Critical thinking and tolerance as well as the ability to engage in informed discussions are indispensable skills.

Based on these facts, free education is not a radical departure from our core American values. On the contrary, it reflects a core of opportunity, responsibility, and an investment in progress. We recognize that the benefits of education extend well beyond the individual and the health of our society depends largely on the education of its people. By funding higher education, we invest in the potential of a future not limited by money.

There is nothing more relevant today than the need for a well-educated society. Free college is not just an ideal or pipe dream, it’s a necessary step toward building a community that values progress. With everything to gain, it becomes our civic duty to share the burden and promote a brighter future.

References